Well, on a lighter note this week, I want to mention the walking librarian. It's an interesting article from the November issue of Library Journal. Stuart Hamilton is a librarian from Denmark. He has been on a journey through the United States, walking across the United States, library to library. I'll admit I do try to visit libraries in every city or town I travel through, but I have never considered walking from one to another across the US and I loved that book Walk Across America by Peter Jenkins. Anyway Stuart and his walking partner noticed across their 5000 miles, big cities and little towns alike all have public libraries. And most notably they all (1 exception) have high speed Internet access. This is definitely something we can be proud of here in the US of A, however, they did mention some concerns with filtering and misconceptions, even ignorance about the patriot act. They were surprised to find that some librarians didn't even know of its existence not to mention its implications. This for me is hard to believe. Even the small town librarians went to library school, they have access to the Internet, hopefully receive some sort of library publication and are possibly even members of the ALA or their state library association. Can it be possible they have missed the Patriot Act and all its intrusion? Well, maybe larger metropolitan libraries and staff (I hope they are up to date) should start an adoption program or something like a sister program where they "adopt" a rural library. These larger libraries could help with resources, information or a sort of support system that I am sure on the whole would benefit all the libraries involved.
Well, I'll let you guys think on that one and in the meantime, yeah to libraries everywhere. Stuart and his friend were able to read, maintain their website, blog, check email, news and anything else they wanted all across the country and I think that is AWESOME! And Stuart, next time come to Oklahoma City!
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Sunday, December 2, 2007
Relevant Terminology
I have been thinking over things I have learned recently. Maybe I knew certain words or concepts but didn't fully grasp their full meaning or how they affected the library profession; and how they might impact the profession in the future. So, I thought I would list some of these important terms and their definitions for everyone to look at, to either refresh your memory or learn something new. I think everyone of these terms should be very familiar to all librarians and information professionals.
Folksonomy-(also known as collaborative tagging , social classification, social indexing, social tagging)is generally a term used to describe the process of categorizing content. Metadata is used for the classification or categorization as opposed to traditional subject headings. One intended purpose is to make information easier to search and navigate.It is often criticized because of its lack of controlled vocabulary which is seen as unreliable. Here's an article from the New York Times and of course Wikipedia has a great overview with lots of links.
Social Networking- Basically a network that connects people to other people, jobs, information, etc. Just watch this video.
Tagging-It's really a label or keyword to describe the content of any type of information. It's seen as a type of metadata that associates descriptors with an object.Tags allow keyword-based classification and a more "extensive" search of information.
RSS(real simple syndication)-XML-based format for content distribution; a family of Web feed formats used to publish frequently updated content such as blog entries, news headlines or latest books on a subject of interest to you, for example. A user has only to subscribe to an RSS feed to receive the new updates of information. Check out this article.
Wiki-A wiki is a type of computer software that allows users to easily create, edit and link web pages. Wikis are often used to create collaborative websites, books and community websites. The most known of all wiki's is Wikipedia, but wiki are springing up all over the place. Why not use your expertise to contribute to one today.
Technorati-is an Internet search engine for searching blogs, competing with Google, Yahoo and IceRocket. Technorati indexes over 94 million weblogs. The name Technorati points to the technological version of literati or intellectuals. Technorati uses and contributes to open source software.
text-mining-also referred to as data-mining, is the process of extracting information from text. Here's an article for a full explanation.
Ontology-As a data model, it seeks to describe basic categories and relationships between entities (of information). Ontologies are used in artificial intelligence, the Semantic Web, software engineering, biomedical informatics and information architecture as a form of knowledge representation about the world or some part of it. One example of an ontology known to librarians would be Dublin Core.
Taxonomies-is the practice and science of classification. Taxonomies use controlled vocabulary ie subject headings and is not itself metadata. Need more help, try this article.
Metadata- most simply it is described as data about data. More specifically it is information about objects(document, image, film, book)with the ultimate purpose of classification for findability.The vocabulary from Dublin Core is the most prevalent. It's properties contain information such as title, creator, subject, description, publisher, and so on.
KM(knowledge management)-comprises a range of practices used by organisations to identify, create, represent, and distribute knowledge. Here is an interesting take on KM from a KMer himself.
Semantic Web-is an evolving extension of the World Wide Web in which web content can be expressed not only in natural language, but also in a format that can be read and used by software agents, thus permitting them to find, share and integrate information more easily. For more clarification check out this site.
Semantic Search Engine-Well, I'll let you read about it.
OSS(open source software)-Free software, available on the web for everyone to use, even you.
Invisible Web-is what you cannot retrieve ("see") in the search results and other links contained on the web. It is estimated that the invisible web contains approximately 7,500 terabytes of data and 550 billion individual documents. Federated searching is one way to access the invisible web.
Folksonomy-(also known as collaborative tagging , social classification, social indexing, social tagging)is generally a term used to describe the process of categorizing content. Metadata is used for the classification or categorization as opposed to traditional subject headings. One intended purpose is to make information easier to search and navigate.It is often criticized because of its lack of controlled vocabulary which is seen as unreliable. Here's an article from the New York Times and of course Wikipedia has a great overview with lots of links.
Social Networking- Basically a network that connects people to other people, jobs, information, etc. Just watch this video.
Tagging-It's really a label or keyword to describe the content of any type of information. It's seen as a type of metadata that associates descriptors with an object.Tags allow keyword-based classification and a more "extensive" search of information.
RSS(real simple syndication)-XML-based format for content distribution; a family of Web feed formats used to publish frequently updated content such as blog entries, news headlines or latest books on a subject of interest to you, for example. A user has only to subscribe to an RSS feed to receive the new updates of information. Check out this article.
Wiki-A wiki is a type of computer software that allows users to easily create, edit and link web pages. Wikis are often used to create collaborative websites, books and community websites. The most known of all wiki's is Wikipedia, but wiki are springing up all over the place. Why not use your expertise to contribute to one today.
Technorati-is an Internet search engine for searching blogs, competing with Google, Yahoo and IceRocket. Technorati indexes over 94 million weblogs. The name Technorati points to the technological version of literati or intellectuals. Technorati uses and contributes to open source software.
text-mining-also referred to as data-mining, is the process of extracting information from text. Here's an article for a full explanation.
Ontology-As a data model, it seeks to describe basic categories and relationships between entities (of information). Ontologies are used in artificial intelligence, the Semantic Web, software engineering, biomedical informatics and information architecture as a form of knowledge representation about the world or some part of it. One example of an ontology known to librarians would be Dublin Core.
Taxonomies-is the practice and science of classification. Taxonomies use controlled vocabulary ie subject headings and is not itself metadata. Need more help, try this article.
Metadata- most simply it is described as data about data. More specifically it is information about objects(document, image, film, book)with the ultimate purpose of classification for findability.The vocabulary from Dublin Core is the most prevalent. It's properties contain information such as title, creator, subject, description, publisher, and so on.
KM(knowledge management)-comprises a range of practices used by organisations to identify, create, represent, and distribute knowledge. Here is an interesting take on KM from a KMer himself.
Semantic Web-is an evolving extension of the World Wide Web in which web content can be expressed not only in natural language, but also in a format that can be read and used by software agents, thus permitting them to find, share and integrate information more easily. For more clarification check out this site.
Semantic Search Engine-Well, I'll let you read about it.
OSS(open source software)-Free software, available on the web for everyone to use, even you.
Invisible Web-is what you cannot retrieve ("see") in the search results and other links contained on the web. It is estimated that the invisible web contains approximately 7,500 terabytes of data and 550 billion individual documents. Federated searching is one way to access the invisible web.
Monday, November 26, 2007
Book 2.0
Books aren't dead, they're just going digital. So says the cover of this weeks (NOV 26th) Newsweek magazine. The article, centered around Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.com and creator of the new Amazon Kindle, examines the future of reading and the future of the book. Great article and I would encourage everyone out there to read it asap. The Kindle is the latest technological device for digital reading. It has it all: wireless Wispernet, E ink (breakthrough product that mimics the clarity and print of a printed book), it's the size of a paperback, weights 10.3 ounces, 30 hours of reading on a rechargeable battery, changeable font size, it's hold 200 books in memory with more on a memory card, and of course an unlimited amount in a virtual library maintained by Amazon. OK, I'm not done yet. The reader can search within the book for a phrase or name, you can in fact search for a book on Amazon, use the keyboard to order the book and have it downloaded to your Kindle in less than a minute and cheaper to, new releases starting at 9.99, with some books at only 1.99. In addition, you can subscribe to newspapers and the new publications are sent directly to your Kindle. The Kindle can also look things up on the web, search Google, and link to and from blogs; it even has an electronic highlighter. WOW, sounds amazing. Oh, what does it cost you ask? Well, that is a bit of a downer at $399 big ones. Hey, if you've got the cash and certainly if you travel a lot, it is definitely worth it.
The implications:
Of course no one wants to see an end of the book. But the question remains, aren't digital books still books? Could it possibly lead to a greater number of readers? In the article Bezos asks himself, "why do I love these physical objects.....the smell of glue and ink"? He says it's because the smell is associated with all the places a book takes him to, all the emotions, all the words and ideas. Critics have until recently believed electronic devices could not accomplish this for a reader, but it is now being disproved; the electronic reader has the same effect as the print version.
Further implications are:
Changes in the publishing industry and they are already resisting the model put forth by Amazon of charging less for books.
Corrections or updates could be made instantly without reprints.
There could be continuous books; books that are purchased knowing an author will add to it in the future or on a regular basis.
Cutting book prices in half could double book sales; who doesn't want to sell more books?
Book 2.0 could have implications like web 2.0; interaction of books and authorship and continuous books, wiki style books (just like Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything).
Reading becomes a community activity.
Could cause a decline or not in printed books.
Well, one last point-Libraries. Libraries were not mentioned in the article and as a librarian and friend of many librarians and one who loves books deeply, I must ask what does this mean for the library? For starters, we still have books in print, so yeah and on we go. For seconds, this technology is very cool, very interactive, transportable, flexible, and so on. Lets embrace it, lets offer these type of services at the library (how about a free downloadable book for your Kindle)and lets move into the future with Amazon and technology instead of lagging behind and trying to resist an inevitable change.
The implications:
Of course no one wants to see an end of the book. But the question remains, aren't digital books still books? Could it possibly lead to a greater number of readers? In the article Bezos asks himself, "why do I love these physical objects.....the smell of glue and ink"? He says it's because the smell is associated with all the places a book takes him to, all the emotions, all the words and ideas. Critics have until recently believed electronic devices could not accomplish this for a reader, but it is now being disproved; the electronic reader has the same effect as the print version.
Further implications are:
Changes in the publishing industry and they are already resisting the model put forth by Amazon of charging less for books.
Corrections or updates could be made instantly without reprints.
There could be continuous books; books that are purchased knowing an author will add to it in the future or on a regular basis.
Cutting book prices in half could double book sales; who doesn't want to sell more books?
Book 2.0 could have implications like web 2.0; interaction of books and authorship and continuous books, wiki style books (just like Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything).
Reading becomes a community activity.
Could cause a decline or not in printed books.
Well, one last point-Libraries. Libraries were not mentioned in the article and as a librarian and friend of many librarians and one who loves books deeply, I must ask what does this mean for the library? For starters, we still have books in print, so yeah and on we go. For seconds, this technology is very cool, very interactive, transportable, flexible, and so on. Lets embrace it, lets offer these type of services at the library (how about a free downloadable book for your Kindle)and lets move into the future with Amazon and technology instead of lagging behind and trying to resist an inevitable change.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Thanksgiving
GIVE ME TURKEY !!
Well this is my I'm oh so thankful for blogs and technology blog. A digital camera, some adobe photo shop (2 images)+ image ready to combine the photos at whatever speed, then top it off with a little html to load it onto the blog. I hope everyone appreciates this very glamorous picture of me and if you haven't tried it, what better time than the holidays! And even though this blog is lacking in intelligent prose, the new technology should be classified as a learning by doing achievement.(OK Doc!)
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Where is the Metadata?
Yes, I am still recovering from the aquabrower presentation and the fact that even Amazon uses the metadata provided by OCLC which is the same metadata libraries use. At least that is what I inferred from some recent information, please feel free to correct me if I am wrong. The point is, it's available and why isn't my library using the metadata and technology to it's full potential? Even without AquaBrowser, the options are endless and awesome and user friendly and cool and technologically updated and aesthetically pleasing and descriptive and what is taking so long for public libraries (not all) to start using this great metadata?
My upset was re-ignited earlier today as I was looking up a public library in California for a patron/customer/guest. I accidentally stumbled upon a library in New York, The South Huntington Public Library, and it is awesome. They have 24 hour librarian reference; RosettaStone, which is online software to learn languages; SuffolkWave, free digital downloads of books, movies, how-to's and music; next reads (self explanatory); online homework help with tutor.com; covers of materials along with descriptions; online signup for programs; beyond Google, a very user friendly guide to using databases; and the catalog, what can I say, it's not a one box search like Google or AquaBrowser, but it has a clear and efficient search including loan rules, request for purchase, ipod options and more, all available for the patron/customer/guest. I just need to say that I think it is very COOL and my library does not have any of these things. Ok we do have ebooks, but it seems so small in comparison.
So what is taking many public libraries so long to use available technology and metadata to benefit the patron and make the library more user friendly? I am looking into it and will try to report back if I find a substantial answer.
My upset was re-ignited earlier today as I was looking up a public library in California for a patron/customer/guest. I accidentally stumbled upon a library in New York, The South Huntington Public Library, and it is awesome. They have 24 hour librarian reference; RosettaStone, which is online software to learn languages; SuffolkWave, free digital downloads of books, movies, how-to's and music; next reads (self explanatory); online homework help with tutor.com; covers of materials along with descriptions; online signup for programs; beyond Google, a very user friendly guide to using databases; and the catalog, what can I say, it's not a one box search like Google or AquaBrowser, but it has a clear and efficient search including loan rules, request for purchase, ipod options and more, all available for the patron/customer/guest. I just need to say that I think it is very COOL and my library does not have any of these things. Ok we do have ebooks, but it seems so small in comparison.
So what is taking many public libraries so long to use available technology and metadata to benefit the patron and make the library more user friendly? I am looking into it and will try to report back if I find a substantial answer.
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Librarians Rock!
I say this with as much enthusiasm as I can possibly muster-librarians rock! Yes, it's true and going to a library conference of any kind is an excellent learning experience. My last post was solely about David Silver and his presentation, but there were other speakers at the ACRL conference. Lynn Connaway from OCLC discussed statistics based research and gave user "quotes" answering the question, Why not libraries? The answers were very mixed but the unifying theme appeared to be that the library is not user friendly, like Google.
Well, I believe librarians love Google as much as our users, but we also understand the necessity to catalog and organize information and yes, we do want it to be user friendly. Which is why the presenter, Anne Prestamo from OSU, showing off their new BOSS catalog was so cool. It is powered by the giant AquaBrowser and they have what I think is a "Google like" interface. It has one search box, spelling suggestions, alternative words and subject suggestions, book covers with summary and table of contents and it is very easy to use. AquaBrowser is one of the finest catalog systems I have seen and it is going to be very interesting to watch and see how widespread it is used.
The last speaker I will mention was Adri Edwards from Norman Public Library. She gave us a fast paced breakout session on blogging. Not how to set up a blog or make it look good, but on the rules, regulations, copyright and avoiding trouble. In addition, Adri showed us how to set up open source tracking software to view user visits. It was very cool and she did a great job with her presentation.
So, the conference was cool. If you haven't been to one lately, go for it!
Well, I believe librarians love Google as much as our users, but we also understand the necessity to catalog and organize information and yes, we do want it to be user friendly. Which is why the presenter, Anne Prestamo from OSU, showing off their new BOSS catalog was so cool. It is powered by the giant AquaBrowser and they have what I think is a "Google like" interface. It has one search box, spelling suggestions, alternative words and subject suggestions, book covers with summary and table of contents and it is very easy to use. AquaBrowser is one of the finest catalog systems I have seen and it is going to be very interesting to watch and see how widespread it is used.
The last speaker I will mention was Adri Edwards from Norman Public Library. She gave us a fast paced breakout session on blogging. Not how to set up a blog or make it look good, but on the rules, regulations, copyright and avoiding trouble. In addition, Adri showed us how to set up open source tracking software to view user visits. It was very cool and she did a great job with her presentation.
So, the conference was cool. If you haven't been to one lately, go for it!
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Library 2.0 and David Silver
Can anyone imagine a combination that could be any more fun? Well neither can I, unless of course it had been a private dinner instead of a conference. Well, dreams aside, David's casual and "conscious" presence was very engaging. He proved to be insightful, a natural speaker and gave me a lot to think about.
Something David mentioned about web 2.0, is it's interactive culture. I very much agree with this and I think it is something we all love. And yet, it seems to be missing in several places: the job atmosphere (employee/employer collaborative relations) and the student/patron atmosphere, in conjunction with libraries and/or library staff. This interactive culture needs to be promoted (thank you David), explored and improved.
Another point worth mentioning is that users of technology don't equal users of other technology (ie facebook is not like using databases); that consumers of information can be shallow and information is rarely transferred to knowledge. David was referring mainly to students, but I see the same phenomena with patrons at my public library. People, without direction and instruction, are not utilizing technology and information resources to the full potential; they are not transferring the information to knowledge. As information professionals we need to be aware of this problem and look for solutions.
The last point David made was actually a series of ideas for the new interactive culture in which we live. He asked "what would a library look like when students are giving?" He suggested we look for ways to use student driven data (ie a book list by students for other students after a study abroad), student book displays and student blogging. David mentioned he always gives his students "in library" assignments: observe book display, interview librarian, blog about the experience, students comment and librarian comment. WOW-librarian comment- this really drew the students in and made them feel apart of the library.
These student assignments, I believe, are key. Although I am no great blogger yet, I don't know if I would have even tried without being forced into it by my fabulous professor Doc Martens!
And yes, I will post more on the other parts of the conference later in the week.
Something David mentioned about web 2.0, is it's interactive culture. I very much agree with this and I think it is something we all love. And yet, it seems to be missing in several places: the job atmosphere (employee/employer collaborative relations) and the student/patron atmosphere, in conjunction with libraries and/or library staff. This interactive culture needs to be promoted (thank you David), explored and improved.
Another point worth mentioning is that users of technology don't equal users of other technology (ie facebook is not like using databases); that consumers of information can be shallow and information is rarely transferred to knowledge. David was referring mainly to students, but I see the same phenomena with patrons at my public library. People, without direction and instruction, are not utilizing technology and information resources to the full potential; they are not transferring the information to knowledge. As information professionals we need to be aware of this problem and look for solutions.
The last point David made was actually a series of ideas for the new interactive culture in which we live. He asked "what would a library look like when students are giving?" He suggested we look for ways to use student driven data (ie a book list by students for other students after a study abroad), student book displays and student blogging. David mentioned he always gives his students "in library" assignments: observe book display, interview librarian, blog about the experience, students comment and librarian comment. WOW-librarian comment- this really drew the students in and made them feel apart of the library.
These student assignments, I believe, are key. Although I am no great blogger yet, I don't know if I would have even tried without being forced into it by my fabulous professor Doc Martens!
And yes, I will post more on the other parts of the conference later in the week.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)